Polling vs Interrupts
(Representational Image | Source: Dall-E)
Quick Navigation:
- Polling vs Interrupts Definition
- Polling vs Interrupts Explained Easy
- Polling vs Interrupts Origin
- Polling vs Interrupts Etymology
- Polling vs Interrupts Usage Trends
- Polling vs Interrupts Usage
- Polling vs Interrupts Examples in Context
- Polling vs Interrupts FAQ
- Polling vs Interrupts Related Words
Polling vs Interrupts Definition
Polling and interrupts are two mechanisms used in computer systems to handle events and manage hardware devices. Polling is a continuous checking process where the CPU repeatedly queries devices to check if they need attention. Interrupts, on the other hand, are signals sent by hardware or software that notify the CPU when an event requires immediate action, allowing it to respond only when needed. While polling consumes more CPU cycles, interrupts improve efficiency by freeing the CPU until necessary.
Polling vs Interrupts Explained Easy
Imagine you are waiting for a package. Polling is like constantly opening the door to check if the package has arrived, even when it hasn’t. Interrupts are like getting a notification on your phone when the delivery arrives, so you don’t waste time checking every few minutes.
Polling vs Interrupts Origin
Polling and interrupts have been fundamental to computing since the early days of operating system development. Early computers relied on polling due to simpler architectures, but as computing demands grew, interrupts became the standard for improving efficiency and resource management.
Polling vs Interrupts Etymology
The term polling comes from the idea of “polling” or checking repeatedly. Interrupts derive from the word “interrupt,” meaning to break or halt an ongoing process to handle an urgent task.
Polling vs Interrupts Usage Trends
With modern computing, interrupts dominate in areas requiring real-time responsiveness, such as operating systems, networking, and embedded systems. However, polling is still used in low-power applications where simplicity is preferred over efficiency, such as embedded controllers or simple input devices.
Polling vs Interrupts Usage
- Formal/Technical Tagging:
- Operating Systems
- Computer Architecture
- Embedded Systems
- Device Management - Typical Collocations:
- "Polling mechanism"
- "Interrupt-driven processing"
- "Polling loop"
- "Interrupt service routine"
Polling vs Interrupts Examples in Context
- A keyboard uses interrupts—when you press a key, an interrupt is sent to the CPU to register the input.
- A CPU checking a temperature sensor every second instead of waiting for an alert is an example of polling.
- In gaming, controllers use interrupts to ensure responsive input without constant checking.
- Polling is often used in low-power IoT devices that check sensors at fixed intervals.
Polling vs Interrupts FAQ
- What is the main difference between polling and interrupts?
Polling continuously checks for events, while interrupts notify the CPU only when needed. - Which is more efficient: polling or interrupts?
Interrupts are generally more efficient since they allow the CPU to perform other tasks until required. - Why is polling still used today?
It is simple to implement and is sometimes preferred in low-power or low-resource environments. - How do interrupts work in an operating system?
The OS assigns interrupt handlers that execute specific actions when an interrupt signal is received. - Can polling be used in real-time systems?
It is generally avoided in real-time systems due to inefficiency, but some deterministic real-time applications may still use it. - What is an example of an interrupt in daily life?
A smartphone receiving a notification when a new message arrives. - How does polling affect CPU performance?
Polling wastes CPU cycles as it continuously checks for events, even if none have occurred. - What is an interrupt service routine (ISR)?
It is a special function executed when an interrupt occurs, handling the required task before resuming normal execution. - Are hardware interrupts and software interrupts the same?
No, hardware interrupts come from external devices, while software interrupts are triggered by programs. - Why are interrupts preferred in multitasking environments?
They allow efficient CPU time allocation, preventing unnecessary resource usage.
Polling vs Interrupts Related Words
- Categories/Topics:
- Computer Science
- Operating Systems
- Embedded Systems
- Hardware-Software Interaction
Did you know?
Early microprocessors relied heavily on polling before interrupt-based architectures became common. The shift to interrupts allowed for more responsive and efficient computing, laying the foundation for modern multitasking operating systems.
Authors | Arjun Vishnu | @ArjunAndVishnu

PicDictionary.com is an online dictionary in pictures. If you have questions or suggestions, please reach out to us on WhatsApp or Twitter.
I am Vishnu. I like AI, Linux, Single Board Computers, and Cloud Computing. I create the web & video content, and I also write for popular websites.
My younger brother, Arjun handles image & video editing. Together, we run a YouTube Channel that's focused on reviewing gadgets and explaining technology.
Comments (0)
Comments powered by CComment